<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comentarios en: Noam Chomsky: On Libya and the Unfolding Crises</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.cubadebate.cu/news/2011/04/06/noam-chomsky-on-libya-and-unfolding-crises/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.cubadebate.cu/news/2011/04/06/noam-chomsky-on-libya-and-unfolding-crises/</link>
	<description>Cubadebate, Against Terrorism in the Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2021 13:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Por: Sasha Smirnoff</title>
		<link>http://en.cubadebate.cu/news/2011/04/06/noam-chomsky-on-libya-and-unfolding-crises/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sasha Smirnoff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 00:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.cubadebate.cu/?p=1187#comment-95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Liberators do not exist. The people liberate themselves.&quot;
That is all that needs to be said re. the cowardly and shameless attack on a sovereign state.
Is Mr. Chomsky giving us an object lesson in &quot;manufactured dissent&quot;? His speech is peppered with terms such as &quot;cruel dictator&quot;, &quot;A slaughter in Benghazi was likely&quot;, &quot;erratic Libyan dictator&quot;, again &quot;Preventing a likely massacre in Benghazi&quot;. Chomsky rejects, by his words, that Qadhafi is the legitimate and popular leader of his embattled nation, and slyly perpetuates the fiction that he&#039;s instead bent on the slaughter of innocent civilians. All of it the same nonsense parroted by the Western media without a shred of evidence to support this argument, relying on loaded terms to appeal to instinct and stampede the mob. Despicable, as I&#039;m sure he already knows who these armed-to-the-teeth &quot;civilians&quot; really are, and at whose behest they are trying to tear apart a country. Libya is indeed crawling with mercenaries, but unlike the Western portrayal, they&#039;re not exactly Qadhafi&#039;s men.
If Chomsky is truly &quot;concerned for peace, justice, freedom and democracy&quot;, he should perhaps free the Libyans of the constraints he himself imposes on them by implying that the patriots/loyalists are somehow supporting an evil dictator who would have carried out a slaughter of innocents in Benghazi. An interesting piece indeed...
What a lovely sheepskin coat Noam, by the way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Liberators do not exist. The people liberate themselves.&#8221;<br />
That is all that needs to be said re. the cowardly and shameless attack on a sovereign state.<br />
Is Mr. Chomsky giving us an object lesson in &#8220;manufactured dissent&#8221;? His speech is peppered with terms such as &#8220;cruel dictator&#8221;, &#8220;A slaughter in Benghazi was likely&#8221;, &#8220;erratic Libyan dictator&#8221;, again &#8220;Preventing a likely massacre in Benghazi&#8221;. Chomsky rejects, by his words, that Qadhafi is the legitimate and popular leader of his embattled nation, and slyly perpetuates the fiction that he&#8217;s instead bent on the slaughter of innocent civilians. All of it the same nonsense parroted by the Western media without a shred of evidence to support this argument, relying on loaded terms to appeal to instinct and stampede the mob. Despicable, as I&#8217;m sure he already knows who these armed-to-the-teeth &#8220;civilians&#8221; really are, and at whose behest they are trying to tear apart a country. Libya is indeed crawling with mercenaries, but unlike the Western portrayal, they&#8217;re not exactly Qadhafi&#8217;s men.<br />
If Chomsky is truly &#8220;concerned for peace, justice, freedom and democracy&#8221;, he should perhaps free the Libyans of the constraints he himself imposes on them by implying that the patriots/loyalists are somehow supporting an evil dictator who would have carried out a slaughter of innocents in Benghazi. An interesting piece indeed&#8230;<br />
What a lovely sheepskin coat Noam, by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
